K5RZR wrote:
Because she is my primary concern, it's her game and she is the primary one playing so if I reference what has happend most of the time it's happend to her more than to myself. Our opinions are just that, ours, we all share the same opinion which we have talked about before making a post. My own opinion is already included in that. I do not say I because I want her to feel included even if I don't feel she should be posting herself at her age.
She is also contributing her thoughts. She has been a part of this since the very first post, another of the reasons that I use "we", because that is the accurate term. If you mean why doesn't she join the forum and post herself, I simply do not feel that would be appropriate at her age to allow her to do so quite yet. Maybe in a couple of years.
I don't know, it just seems to me that you're taking a video game a bit too seriously. I just figured a high ranking officer has better (and more important!) things to do than to spend so much time and effort on a $60 dollar product. What happend to the ol' military principle of cutting your loses and moving on. If the game is so unplayable, why not just buy another more appropriate game for a fourteen year old.
The other issue I take with your comments is that you haven't done any research into the concerns with which you're so incredibly concerned. As a military man, I'[m sure you understand the value of being fully informed. Without even remotely searching your issues in these forums, you risk appearing ignorant and uninformed.
I strongly suggest you take the time (which you obviously have plenty of) to be more educated on these issues. Otherwise, you'll only appear to be unreasonable and obtuse.
To desire something to fixed is one thing; to not understand the practicalities and practicableness and still demand it is simply immature and naive.